Rudolf Urech, Peter Green and Geoff Brown
Department of Primary Industries Queensland, Locked Bag
No. 4, Moorooka Qld 4105
email UrechR@dpi.qld.gov.au
web site www.dpi.qld.gov.au
Summary
LuciTrap is a selective trapping system for the Australian sheep blowfly,
Lucilia cuprina. Improvements have been made to LuciLure, the synthetic
attractant used in the trap, and LuciTrap. The shelf life of LuciLure was
extended from four months to two years by separating two reacting components
to produce a new, 3-bottle LuciLure. The concentrations of all components
in the new LuciLure were >97 per cent of the original concentrations
after 56 days at 50oC. The new LuciLure was as effective as the original
lure in catching L. cuprina (mean catch 56 and 63 flies per trap and period
respectively, no significant difference). The LuciTrap with a new, more transparent
bucket caught more L. cuprina (mean per trap and period 55) than with the
original trap bucket (mean 49, difference not significant). These improvements
make the LuciTrap an even more attractive component of any control strategy
for sheep blowflies.
Flytrapping in Tasmania: effective use of traps in a cool temperate climate
Brian Horton1, Michael Lang2, Calluna
Denwood2, Jan Horton2 and Scott Champion2
DPIWE, PO Box 46 , Kings Meadows, Tasmania
TIAR, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
email brian.horton@dpiwe.tas.gov.au
Summary
Flies were trapped on a wide range of properties throughout Tasmania using
the commercially available Lucitrap®. Features contributing
to variation in Lucilia cuprina catch between traps were identified. Some
additional features were tested by attaching traps near or far from identified
features or using traps in pairs on the same post.
One property was trapped in a regular grid rather than using selected "good" trap sites. This confirmed the guidelines previously used to select trap sites.
In Tasmania flytraps are most effective in sites near water, exposed to
the sun, but sheltered from the wind and attached to posts rather than trees.
The lures must be replaced every three months and the traps must be cleaned
each year.
Blowfly Traps and prevention of flystrike; a review of the New Zealand experience
ACG Heath and DM Leathwick
AgResearch Wallaceville, PO Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand
AgResearch Grasslands, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North,
New Zealand
E-mail; allen.heath@agresearch.co.nz
Summary
A brief review is presented of experiments in New Zealand where flytraps
have been used as a means of preventing flystrike. In one, 150 L bait-bins
containing offal were deployed on an "organic" farm without an untrapped
control property for comparison. This feature of the design and the associated
low flystrike prevalence over the three "seasons" of the trial meant no definite
conclusion could be reached as to the efficacy of the flytraps. A second
experiment had adequate controls but found that 200L bait-bins containing
offal did not reduce the prevalence of flystrike in comparison with other
sheep in the absence of flytraps. This experiment was of short duration and
was carried out at the height of blowfly activity. A third experiment, also
using 200L offal-baited bins, extended from before flystrike was expected
to the end of blowfly activity. It was shown that sheep in the presence of
the traps (at a density of about 0.2 traps/ha) had 34 % fewer strikes (P=0.11)
than other sheep in the absence of flytraps. The traps were moved with the
sheep as they changed paddocks to new grazing. Finally, a group of 15 farmers
on large properties with fine-wooled sheep employed 10L offal-baited buckets
which were used both as static traps and moved with sheep to new grazing.
Two properties acted as controls. Problems associated with maintenance of
the traps and other imperatives of farm management provided inconclusive results,
although employing the traps was seen as beneficial by some farmers and certainly
provided a focus for improving knowledge about blowflies and flystrike.
Overall it was concluded that flytraps may have the ability to reduce
flystrike prevalence but this has not been demonstrated in this series of
experiments. If flytraps can be consistently effective they have a role to
play as one of the components of a fully integrated flystrike management
programme.
The application of trapping, using the Lucitrap®
system, in an integrated blowfly management program in South Africa
Anna J Scholtz1, SWP Cloete1, JM Laubscher
1, E du Toit2, WB Techman1 and EF de Beer
3
1Animal Production Division, Elsenburg ADC, Private
Bag X1, Elsenburg 7607, South Africa
2Tygerhoek Experimental Farm, PO Box 25, Riviersonderend
7250, South Africa
3NWGA Extension services, PO Box 230, Caledon
7250, South Africa
email ansies@wcape.agric.za
web site www.elsenburg.com
Summary
The large-scale trapping of blowflies of the genus Lucilia, using
an insecticide free trapping system (Lucitrap®), was evaluated for use
in an integrated pest management program in the Western Cape. Traps were set
at three localities in the 2 cropping-pasture areas of the Swartland and South
Coast regions. These areas were referred to as suppression areas, on the
assumption that trapping will affect the Lucilia populations therein.
Control sites, where no suppression was practiced, were identified for each
of these localities. The Lucilia population was monitored for 48hours
at each of the localities on a monthly basis. Five traps were used to monitor
the blowfly populations within each of the suppression areas and the adjacent
control areas. In the Swartland region, the overall yield of flies of the
genus Lucilia was lower (P<0.05) in the suppression areas than in
the neighbouring control areas over a 30-month period from October 1998 to
March 2001 (7.9 vs. 6.2 flies per trap, respectively). Designation of the
monitoring trap, however, interacted with month, possibly owing to very low
catches during winter, when fly numbers trapped did not differ from zero.
During the last two months of the experimental period, higher Lucilia
numbers were also found in the suppression area. In the South Coast localities,
Lucilia numbers were also reduced (P<0.01) in the suppression areas
compared to the control areas over the 30-month trial period. Respective overall
means in the Caledon area were 22.3 vs. 10.8 flies per trap, i.e. a reduction
of 51.6%. Corresponding means in the Riviersonderend area were 18.4 vs. 12.6
flies per trap, i.e. a reduction of 31.5%. Geometric means for blowfly numbers
at all three localities were generally > 100 flies per trap for spring
and early summer. It was concluded that large-scale trapping of blowflies
may be of value in an integrated pest management system. Further work is
being conducted.
Use of LuciTrap by groups of woolgrowers to control flystrike
M P Ward 1,2
and R A Farrell1
1 Agency for Food and
Fibre Sciences (Sheep and Wool), Department of Primary Industries, Queensland,
Locked Mailbag 4, Moorooka Qld 4105
2 Present address: Department
of Veterinary Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University,
West Layfayette IN 47907-1234 USA
email farrelr@dpi.qld.gov.au
web site www.dpi.qld.gov.au
Summary
LuciTrap — a novel blowfly trapping system based on synthetic kairomones
that preferentially attract Lucilia cuprina — was assessed for effectiveness
using a field trial conducted in southern Queensland and field use by four
groups of woolgrowers located near Stanthorpe (Traprock Wool group), Goondiwindi,
Bollon and Cunnamulla (Noorama group). The trial consisted of paired (treatment,
control) groups of sheep on two properties. A total of 2149 sheep were enrolled
in the trial. Trap use resulted in up to 46 per cent reduction in flystrike.
LuciTrap group members were responsible for planning and implementing
how the traps were used and for collecting information to assess the usefulness
of the traps under commercial sheep and wool production conditions. The
Stanthorpe and Cunnamulla groups were formed in 1998 and the Goondiwindi
and Bollon groups were formed in 1999. Approximately 203 000 sheep (representing
>2 per cent of the Queensland sheep population) were grazed within these
groups. The group approach has provided valuable feedback on trap design
and strategies for using traps. Support for the four groups ended in June
2001.
Estimating population densities of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from catches in wind-oriented traps
The Late W. G. Vogt, A. C. M. van Gerwen and J. M. Walker
CSIRO Division of Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT
2601, Australia
Summary
An analysis of 2-hourly catches of the blowfly, Lucilia cuprina,
in 10 wind-oriented fly traps on 34 trapping days (06.00 – 18.00h) during
the period November 1984 – May 1985 indicated that air temperature was the
principal factor regulating the number of insects caught. Small but significant
effects were associated with radiation, time of day and relative humidity;
effects due to wind were not significant. Temperature (T°C), within days,
accounted 62% of the explained deviance, this value increasing to 71.8% with
the inclusion of all significant variables. Using temperature alone, the
adjusted hourly catch rate, R, can be derived from the expression: R
ij = exp(0.9396T - 0.0156T2 - 14.148). When radiation (RAD,
mWh/cm2) is included, Rij = exp(0.7781T - 0.0127T
2 - 0.0126RAD - 13.488). The age structure of trapped females in wind-oriented
traps is shown to differ significantly from that obtained with West Australian
traps and probably reflects differences in bait composition. Methods are
given to correct wind-oriented trap catches for differences in trappability
between males and females and between females of differing physiological
age. The transformation of catches of wild flies into estimates of relative
and absolute population density is also described.
"Bait bins", Time Series Analysis and Lucilia cuprina .
L.J. McLeod1 and S.R. McLeod2
1CERIT, University of New South Wales
Present address: Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, NSW Agriculture,
Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800
lynette.mcleod@agric.nsw.gov.au
2School or Biological Science, University of New South Wales
Summary
This ten year study investigates the seasonality of the blowfly Lucilia
cuprina in far western New South Wales by using time series analysis.
The effect of using bait bins as a management tool was also investigated
by using interrupted (intervention) time series analysis. Lucilia cuprina
showed a strong seasonal abundance. There was a positive correlation between
sheep strike and the previous month’s L. cuprina numbers, and a negative
correlation between strike and the population numbers of L. cuprina
from two month’s previous. Sheep strike was correlated with the previous
month’s rainfall. The results from the interrupted time series analysis indicated
that there were no significant effects of bait bins on L. cuprina population
numbers, or on the incidence of sheep strike.
Flytrapping in Tasmania: use of traps for flystrike control and monitoring fly populations
Brian Horton1, Jan Horton2 and Scott
Champion2
1DPIWE, PO Box 46 , Kings Meadows, Tasmania
2TIAR, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania
email brian.horton@dpiwe.tas.gov.au
Summary
Lucitraps were used on 60 properties (2 to 4 traps each) throughout Tasmania
for between 1 and 3 years to monitor fly numbers and compare these with reports
of flystrike. The number of flies trapped varied widely between different
properties in the same district but individual properties had consistently
high or low fly catches. This was related to the actual risk of flystrike
at each property.
On 16 other properties fly-traps were used at 1 trap per 100 sheep and provided information on the areas of high fly activity within the property. This could be used to find safer paddocks for sheep at most risk or indicate which mobs require protective treatment and mobs that can safely be left untreated. Monitoring can also be used to determine the number of active flies at different times during the fly season.
The owners of the properties with a high trap density believed that flystrike would have been worse without the fly-traps, particularly in the second year of the 3 year study when the incidence of flystrike was high throughout the state. However, the traps did not provide a major reduction in flystrike, nor allow a substantial reduction in treatments. We suggest that the rate of use of 1 trap per 100 sheep may not be adequate in all cases.