Return to main program page

The Cutting Edge (An Account of Mulesing in Tasmania)
Alan Jones
DPIWE, PO Box 46, Kings Meadows Tasmania
email: ajones@vision.net.au

Summary
Tasmania started serioulsy promoting mulesing as a flystrike management tool in 1965. The small-scale hands-on learning field days resulted in the rapid development of a pool of skilled mulesing operators, many of whom were flock owners or managers. Within ten years half of the sheep in the state were being mulesed, and mulesing is now accepted as a management tool by most wool producers in Tasmania.
 
 

Future options to reduce reliance on surgical mulesing
L.J.E. KarlssonA, D.L. EvansB , J.C. GreeffA
A Agriculture Western Australia, Katanning, Western Australia 6317
B Agriculture Western Australia, Denmark, Western Australia 6333
email: jkarlsson@agric.wa.gov.au

Summary
Although most members of the sheep industry currently defend surgical mulesing, there are strong indications that this position cannot be sustained in the medium to long term.

The industry must support a research and development program to enable an orderly retreat from surgical mulesing to non-surgical alternatives. In the short to medium term, non-genetic options can be used. Some of these will result in extra and on-going costs.

The long-term solutions should be based on an investment in permanent genetic solutions, as this will be cost effective to farmers in the long term. It is also likely to be the most advantageous option for public perception and consumer preferences.

This issue is very similar to integrated parasite management, where the short-term emphasis involves non-genetic solutions while there is a commitment to a longer-term genetic solution.
 
 

A benefit-cost analysis of the mules operation to the Australian sheep flock
D. Counsell
The Mackinnon Project, University of Melbourne Veterinary School
250 Princess Highway Werribee VIC 3030

Summary
This paper reports a benefit-cost analysis of the value of mulesing to Australian sheep producers. It was estimated that the average Australian sheep producer receives a benefit of approximately $1.84 per sheep each year from mulesing their lambs. If flocks did not routinely mules their lambs, it was predicted that they would need a significant increase in on-farm labour. The high cost of this labour would necessitate the use of alternative preventative measures, mainly chemical treatments, to prevent flystrike. This would significantly increase the total chemical residue load in the Australian wool clip.
 
 

Specialist forages – A role in flystrike management ?
D.M. Leathwick * and A.C.G Heath
AgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand
AgResearch, Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, P.O. Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand
Email Dave.Leathwick@agresearch.co.nz

Summary
Forage plants which naturally contain condensed tannins have been under investigation for many years for their potential to ameliorate the impacts of intestinal parasites. Trials showed that lambs grazed on these forages developed fewer dags than lambs grazed on other herbages such as lucerne or pasture and in one case there was an associated reduction in flystrike prevalence. We review subsequent trials which confirmed that lambs grazed on birdsfoot trefoil, a condensed tannin-containing forage, developed fewer dags and suffered less from flystrike than lambs grazed on ryegrass / white clover. This occurred as long as the lambs grazed the birdsfoot trefoil for 7 or more days each fortnight. A series of extension / technology transfer trials on commercial sheep farms confirmed these findings with lambs grazed on pasture being 5 times more likely to be flystruck than lambs grazed on birdsfoot trefoil. Although these forages are expensive to grow and lack persistence farmer interest in them remains high. A number of options for integrating such forages into an integrated programme of flystrike management are proposed.
 
 

Breeding for resistance to fly strike
I.G. Colditz1, L.R. Piper 1and K. D. Atkins2
1CSIRO Livestock Industries, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale NSW 2350 and
2NSW Agriculture, Orange Agricultural Institute,Orange,2800
email: ian.colditz@li.csiro.au

Summary
Fleece rot and body strike form a disease complex. The major components of resistance to body strike so far identified are wool and body conformation traits affecting susceptibility to fleece rot. The role of the host response in contributing to resistance to fleece rot and body strike is not clear, although the enhanced antibody responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa seen in sheep selected for resistance to the disease complex may be important. The sporadic occurrence of body strike due to climatic variability necessitates indirect selection. Fleece rot has a high genetic correlation with body strike and is therefore a candidate for indirect selection; however, culling of sheep with fleece rot is already the industry norm. Thus indicator traits with higher prevalence or higher genetic correlation with body strike than is the case for fleece rot are needed to enhance rates of genetic improvement. Direct challenge with internal parasites has been a successful strategy for selecting sheep for resistance to internal parasites. It is unknown whether genetic variation occurs between sheep in survival and growth of larvae after eggs are deposited on the sheep. This question should be investigated to establish whether there is scope for selection for resistance to body strike independently of fleece rot. Applying contemporary molecular genetic techniques such as gene expression arrays to sheep with variability in resistance to fleece rot or larval survival and growth may lead to identification of gene markers for resistance.
 
 

Blowfly strike of Merino sheep in relation to selection strategy, as well as to objective and subjective wool traits
SWP Cloete1, JJ Olivier2 and E du Toit 3
1Animal Production Division, Elsenburg ADC, Private Bag X1, Elsenburg 7607, South Africa
2Irene Animal Improvement Institute, Private Bag X529, Middelburg 5900, South Africa
3Tygerhoek Experimental Farm, PO Box 25, Riviersonderend 7250, South Africa
email schalkc@wcape.agric.za
web site www.elsenburg.com

Summary
The frequency of flystrike on specific sites (breech, body and poll) was investigated in 16-month hoggets from a selection experiment with South African Merinos. Lines that were involved were selected for an increased fleece weight, against reproduction failure and for a reduced fibre diameter. A Control line where no directed selection was done was maintained together with the selection lines. Data were obtained for 2 progeny groups, born in 1998 and 1999. Line differences in fleece and body traits were in correspondence with the selection objectives strived for. The clean fleece weight of progeny in the Fleece Weight line was 24% higher (P<0.05) than that of the Control line. Fibre diameter in the Fine wool line was approximately 9% finer (P<0.05) than in the other lines. The Wet and Dry line were plainer (P<0.05) with regard to fold development than the other lines, except the Fine wool line. No significant differences were found between lines for either breech, body or poll strike (the latter was assessed only in ram hoggets born during 1999). When data for the three selection lines were pooled, a lower proportion of selection line hoggets was affected by combined breech and/or body strike than control group contemporaries (0.125 vs. 0.189; P<0.05). Clean fleece weight and staple strength were compromised (P<0.05) in animals affected by body strike. Subjective scores for wool quality, regularity of crimp, wool colour and underlines were lower (P<0.05) in animals that suffered from body strike than in contemporaries that were not affected. In the case of breech strike, these relationships were not as clear, and differences (P<0.05) were only found for regularity of crimp and staple formation.
 
 

Current research by NSW Agriculture on the genetics of flystrike resistance
S.I. Mortimer
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823
Email sue.mortimer@agric.nsw.gov.au

Summary
This review describes research projects conducted currently by NSW Agriculture targeted at the development of Merino breeding programs for commercial producers and ram breeders that incorporate flystrike resistance. Outcomes from these projects will include additional information on the mode of inheritance of flystrike resistance and the development of integrated breeding programs for resistance. Projects are planned to: estimate genetic differences in fleece rot resistance from industry sources; estimate genetic parameters involving resistance to body strike and fleece rot resistance; describe selection responses in body strike and fleece rot resistance; identify markers for major genes for resistance; evaluate different strategies to include resistance in Merino breeding programs; and evaluate the use of marker-assisted selection for resistance in Merino breeding programs. Existing technology transfer initiatives are also described.
 
 

Flystrike resistance in the breeding programs of ram breeding flocks
S.I. Mortimer
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie NSW 2823
Email sue.mortimer@agric.nsw.gov.au

Summary

Flystrike resistance in breeding programs for commercial flocks
S.I. Mortimer
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie NSW 2823
Email sue.mortimer@agric.nsw.gov.au

Summary

Return to main program page